The geography of childhood as a new research area

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33910/2687-0223-2019-1-3-167-173

Keywords:

geography, the geography of childhood, the geography of childhood methodology, emotional reflexivity, research methods

Abstract

The article reveals the historical and methodological foundations for the development of the geography of childhood abroad. This research area, formed at the intersection of humanitarian geography and new social research of childhood, was born in the early 1970s within the framework of geographical sciences in the United States of America under the influence of developmental psychology and environmental psychology. The next phase of the scientific area’s development is associated with the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, the recognition of the subject matter of the child and the politicisation of the topic of children’s rights. The modern stage of the geography of childhood is characterised by the development of interdisciplinary research areas with the focus on understanding children’s modern lives through exploring space, place and scale.

The geography of childhood is closely connected with the geography of young people, although the latter has more access to the macro level, while the geography of childhood is often criticised for its excessive attention to the micro level.

Promising areas of research in the geography of childhood are:

  • memory, emotions, affects, proximity and vulnerability which imply autoethnographic and creative approach;
  • games, entertainment and care (methodologically expressed by introducing game methods of research);
  • material and popular culture — significant objects of children’s everyday lives.

The methodology of the geography of childhood is characterised by the children’s involvement in the research process as co-researchers. Here, qualitative methods (interviews, children’s drawings, focus groups, included observation, and ethnographic study), and the mapping method are used along with quantitative methods (questionnaires and achievement tests). The researcher needs emotional reflexivity, which enables him to adjust to the child respondent, capture his mood, and subsequently understand how children perceive researchers in their worlds and why they share information with them as well as interpret the obtained data and design meanings.

The spatial view of childhood encourages the application of new research optics as well as an interdisciplinary convergence of researchers, primarily geographers, sociologists and educators.

References

Aitken, C. S. (2018) Children’s geographies: Tracing the evolution and involution of a concept. Geographical Review, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 3–23. DOI: 10.1111/gere.12289 (In English)

Allerton, C. (ed.). (2016) Children: Ethnographic encounters. London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 200 p. (In English)

Fay, F. (2018) The impact of the school space on research methodology, child participation and safety: Views from children in Zanzibar. Children’s Geographies, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 405–417. DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2017.1344770 (In English)

Hackett, A., MacRae, C., McCall, K. et al. (2018) Coda: Posthumous conversations. A reading group to discuss the work of Dr Elee Kirk. Children’s Geographies, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 571–577. DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2018.1497142 (In English)

Harju, A. (2018) Children practising politics through spatial narratives. Children’s Geographies, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 196–207. DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2017.1350635 (In English)

Hart, R. (1979) Children’s experience of place. New York: Irvington Publishers, 518 p. (In English)

Hashemi, M., Sánchez-Jankowski, M. (eds.). (2013) Children in crisis: Ethnographic studies in international contexts. New York: Routledge, 140 p. DOI: 10.4324/9780203387764 (In English)

Honkanen, K., Poikolainen, J., Karlsson, L. (2018) Children and young people as co-researchers — Researching subjective well-being in residential area with visual and verbal methods. Children’s Geographies, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 184–195. DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2017.1344769 (In English)

Huijsmans, R. (2018) “Knowledge that moves”: Emotions and affect in policy and research with young migrants. Children’s Geographies, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 628–641. DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2018.1468869 (In English)

Irvine, R. D. G., Lee, E. (2018) Over and under: Children navigating terrain in the East Anglian fenlands. Children’s Geographies, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 380–392. DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2017.1344768 (In English)

James, S. (1990) Is there a “place” for children in geography? Area, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 278–283. (In English)

Khan, A. A. (2018) From the peaks and back: Mapping the emotions of trans-Himalayan children education migration journeys in Kathmandu, Nepal. Children’s Geographies, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 616–627. DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2018.1479732 (In English)

Konventsiya o pravakh rebenka. Prinyata rezolyutsiej 44/25 General’noj Assamblei ot 20 noyabrya 1989 goda [Convention on the Rights of the Child: adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989]. (1989) [Online]. Available at: https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/childcon.shtml (accessed 02.10.2019). (In Russian)

Kraftl, P., Horton, J. (2019) Neon bright: Cool Places, youth cultures and hopeful political-theoretical futures. Children’s Geographies, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 17–23. DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2018.1536255 (In English)

McNamee, S. (2016) The social study of childhood. London; New York: Palgrave, 224 p. (In English)

Monk, J. (2019) Mapping the soft city: Using cognitive mapping to respond to London-based literature and explore the construction of teenage place-related identity. Children’s Geographies, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 162–176. DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2018.1471448 (In English)

Naafs, S., Skelton, T. (2018) “Youthful futures? Aspirations, education and employment in Asia”. Children’s Geographies, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–14. DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2018.1402164 (In English)

Roerig, S., Evers, S. J. T. M. (2019) Theatre Elicitation: Developing a potentially child-friendly method with children aged 8–12. Children’s Geographies, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 133–147. DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2017.1407404 (In English)

Skelton, T. (2018) FOREWORD. Playfulness in geography: Respite from neo-liberalism in the academy? Children’s Geographies, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 444–445. DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2018.1457707 (In English)

Skelton, T. (2019) Youthful geographies: From Cool Places to hyperdynamic Asia. Children’s Geographies, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 24–27. DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2018.1535696 (In English)

Valentine, G. (2019) Geographies of youth — a generational perspective. Children’s Geographies, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 28–31. DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2018.1535697 (In English)

van Blerk, L. (2019) Where in the world are youth geographies going? Reflections on the journey and directions for the future. Children’s Geographies, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 32–35. DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2018.1535695 (In English)

Published

2019-11-21

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>