Saint Petersburg for adolescents: The territory of everyday life

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33910/2687-0223-2021-3-4-297-308

Keywords:

urban environment, social space, adolescents, friendly environment, everyday life

Abstract

The article presents a study of Saint Petersburg as a space of adolescents’ everyday life. Urbanists, architects, sociologists, educators, psychologists and other specialists currently focus on the feelings, moods and communications of city dwellers, including young ones. The article examines adolescents’ independent movements, interactions and choice of locations in the area of their residence and in the city as a whole. In order for adolescents to recognise a location as “their own”, it should be comfortable (so that they can get cosy, get warm and eat there), safe (both physically and emotionally) and interesting (there is something to see, there is something to do). The main thing that attracts adolescents to “their” place is the opportunity to communicate freely. Their “own” place is not always an area designed for that purpose; adolescents often adapt existing urban elements to their needs. However, it is still necessary to create diverse public and cultural spaces for young people. Comparing adolescent’s experience in Saint Petersburg to that of adolescents from other cities, it becomes clear that the lack of such spaces leads them to compete and conflict with other groups of citizens, reducing the opportunities for young people. In Saint Petersburg, as opposed to other Russian cities, there exists a rich environment that offers adolescents a choice of pastime locations both in the centre and in the suburbs. Nevertheless, in Saint Petersburg, the interests of other groups of citizens prevail over the interests of adolescents, and their “voice” is not heard when urban areas are created or improved. Involving adolescents in designing such places will make it possible to take their interests into account and create an environment that is more friendly to young people.

References

ЛИТЕРАТУРА

Бредникова, О., Запорожец, О. (ред.). (2014) Микроурбанизм: Город в деталях. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 352 с.

Воронкова, Л., Паченков, О. (ред.). (2014) SAGA о городе. Трансформация общественных пространств. СПб.: НП-Принт, 189 с.

Краткая справка о культурно-историческом и экономическом потенциале Московского административного района города Санкт-Петербурга. (2021) Администрация Санкт-Петербурга. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.gov.spb.ru/gov/terr/reg_moscow/information/ (дата обращения 30.08.2021).

Лебедева, Е. В., Филипова, А. Г., Березецкая, М. И. и др. (2020) Дружественность городской среды: возможности интерпретации и измерения, опыт создания. Минск: Белорусский государственный университет, 207 с.

Ле-ван, Т., Филатова, Б., Якшина, А. (2021) Как спроектировать школьный двор: соучаствующее проектирование с детьми и школьным сообществом. Идеи для руководителей. М.: Экон-Информ, 58 с.

Наберушкина, Э. К. (2012) Инвалиды в большом городе: Проблемы социального гражданства. М.: Вариант, 334 с.

Ненько, А. (2018) Какие районы Петербурга вызывают у горожан радость и грусть и как исследование эмоций поможет улучшить город? Рассказывает социолог. Бумага, 11 июля. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://paperpaper.ru/campus/nenko/ (дата обращения 15.07.2021).

Ульянова, Е. В. (2016) Развитие общественных пространств: инвестиционный потенциал и модели реализации. Администрация Санкт-Петербурга. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.gov.spb.ru/static/writable/mediact/materials/2016/12/01/Презентация_общественные_пространства_24112016_pdf (дата обращения 30.08.2021).

Филипова, А. Г., Купряшкина, Е. А., Бухтиярова, И. Н. и др. (2020) Детство на Дальнем Востоке: воспроизводство, миграция и мобильности. Социопространственный анализ. Санкт-Петербург: Астерион, 236 с.

Филипова, А. Г., Ракитина, Н. Э. (2017) Городская «доброжелательность» к детям: от неравенства к соучаствующему проектированию городской среды (на материалах городов юга Дальнего Востока). Владивосток: Изд-во Дальневосточного федерального института, 188 с.

REFERENCES

Brednikova, O., Zaporozhets, O. (eds.). (2014) Mikrourbanizm: Gorod v detalyakh [Microurbanism. The city in details]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 352 p. (In Russian)

Filipova, A. G., Kupryashkina, E. A., Buhtiyarova, I. N. et al. (2020) Detstvo na Dal’nem Vostoke: vosproizvodstvo, migratsiya i mobil’nosti. Sotsioprostranstvennyj analiz [Childhood in the Far East: Reproduction, migration and mobility. Sociospatial analysis]. Saint Petersburg: Asterion Publ., 236 p. (In Russian)

Filipova, A. G., Rakitina, N. E. (2017) Gorodskaya “dobrozhelatel’nost’” k detyam: ot neravenstva k souchastvuyushchemu proektirovaniyu gorodskoj sredy (na materialakh gorodov yuga Dal’nego Vostoka) [Urban “goodwill” to children: From inequality to collaborative design of the urban environment (based on the materials of cities in the South of the Far East)]. Vladivostok: Far Eastern Federal University Publ., 188 p. (In Russian)

Kratkaya spravka o kul’turno-istoricheskom i ekonomicheskom potentsiale Moskovskogo administrativnogo rajona goroda Sankt-Peterburga [Brief information about the cultural, historical and economic potential of the Moscow administrative district of Saint Petersburg]. (2021). Administratsiya Sankt-Peterburga [Saint Petersburg administration]. [Online]. Available at: https://www.gov.spb.ru/gov/terr/reg_moscow/information/ (accessed 30.08.2021). (In Russian)

Lebedeva, E. V., Filipova, A. G., Berezetskaya, M. I. et al. (2020) Druzhestvennost’ gorodskoj sredy: vozmozhnosti interpretatsii i izmereniya, opyt sozdaniya [The friendliness of the urban environment: The possibilities of interpretation and measurement, the experience of creating]. Minsk: Belarusian State University Publ., 207 p. (In Russian)

Le-van, T., Filatova, B., Yakshina, A. (2021) Kak sproektirovat’ shkol’nyj dvor: souchastvuyushchee proektirovanie s det’mi i shkol’nym soobshchestvom. Idei dlya rukovoditelej [How to design a schoolyard: A participatory design with children and the school community. Ideas for managers]. Moscow: Ekon-Inform Publ., 58 p. (In Russian)

Naberushkina, E. K. (2012) Invalidy v bol’shom gorode: Problemy sotscial’nogo grazhdanstva [The disabled in a big city: Problems of social citizenship]. Moscow: Variant Publ., 334 p. (In Russian)

Nen’ko, A. (2018) Kakie rajony Peterburga vyzyvayut u gorozhan radost’ i grust’ i kak issledovanie emotsij pomozhet uluchshit’ gorod? Rasskazyvaet sotsiolog [Which areas of Saint Petersburg cause joy and sadness among citizens and how will the study of emotions help to improve the city? The opinion of the sociologist]. Bumaga, 11 July. [Online]. Available at: https://paperpaper.ru/campus/nenko/ (accessed 15.07.2021). (In Russian)

Ul’yanova, E. V. (2016) Razvitie obshchestvennykh prostranstv: investitsionnyj potentsial i modeli realizatsii [Development of public spaces: Investment potential and implementation models]. Administratsiya Sankt-Peterburga [Saint Petersburg administration]. [Online]. Available at: https://www.gov.spb.ru/static/writable/mediact/materials/2016/12/01/Презентация_общественные_пространства_24112016_.pdf (accessed 30.08.2021). (In Russian)

Voronkova, L., Pachenkov, O. (eds.). (2014) SAGA o gorode. Transformatsiya obshchestvennykh prostranstv [The City SAGA. Public spaces in transformation]. Saint Petersburg: NP-Print Publ., 189 p. (In Russian)

Published

2022-02-07

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>