Mechanisms triggered by transcranial magnetic exposure

Overview of current research

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33910/2687-0223-2023-5-3-202-206

Keywords:

transcranial magnetic stimulation, speech, speech problems, boys, girls

Abstract

The review attempts to describe the current understanding of the processes that occur in the brain during transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). It was shown that this effect is often used in attempts to activate speech processes in children, primarily boys. The study specifies the reason why speech problems are more common in boys compared to girls. It is noted that the physiological distribution of TMS is difficult to model, because the cerebrospinal fluid as well as white and gray matter have different conductivity. First, I propose three early hypotheses linking the changes in the brain and TMS: the disorganization of network activity; the competition hypothesis, which implies that TMS suppresses neural activity, i. e., reduces the signal but does not add noise; and the hypothesis that the brain improves signal detection at lower activity intensity. The emergence of new technologies made it possible not only to test these hypotheses but also to find out possible changes in the state of brain tissue activity at the site of TMS exposure. The article describes the results of the studies in which TMS was performed in parallel with EEG measurements and functional tomography and presents the data obtained during stimulation of the prefrontal cortex, sensory cortex and parietal region. These technologies made it possible to show that changes in the activity of brain neurons occur not only at the site of SCI impact but also in distant deep structures. The most important result was that weakly active populations of neurons and neurons that were activated before exposure to TMS were activated to the greatest extent during TMS. This result suggests that TMS will be particularly effective when used on children with speech problems if a speech task is presented immediately prior to exposure.

References

Aberra, A. S., Wang, B., Grill, W. M., Peterchev, A. V. (2020) Simulation of transcranial magnetic stimulation in head model with morphologically-realistic cortical neurons. Brain Stimulation, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2019.10.002 (In English)

Bonini, L., Serventi, F. U., Simone, L. et al. (2011) Grasping neurons of monkey parietal and premotor cortices encode action goals at distinct levels of abstraction during complex action sequences. The Journal of Neurosciences, vol. 31, no. 15, pp. 5876–5887. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5186-10.2011 (In English)

D’Esposito, M., Postle, B. R. (2015) The cognitive neuroscience of working memory. Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 66, pp. 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015031 (In English)

Goldberg, E. (2003) Upravlyayushchij mozg: Lobnye doli, liderstvo i tsivilizatsiya [The executive brain: Frontal lobes and the civilized mind]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., 335 p. (In Russian)

Handwerker, D. A., Ianni, G., Gutierrez, B. et al. (2020) Theta-burst TMS to the posterior superior temporal sulcus decreases resting-state fMRI connectivity across the face processing network. Network Neurosciences, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 746–760. https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00145 (In English)

Harris, J. A., Clifford, C. W. G., Miniussi, C. (2008) The functional effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation: Signal suppression or neural noise generation? Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 734–40. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20048 (In English)

Kim, S., Nilakantan, A. S., Hermiller, M. S. et al. (2018) Selective and coherent activity increases due to stimulation indicate functional distinctions between episodic memory networks. Science Advances, vol. 4, no. 8, article eaar2768. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aar2768 (In English)

Martin, R. (2013) How we do it. New York: Basic Books Publ., 320 p. (In English)

Miniussi, C., Harris, J. A., Ruzzoli, M. (2013) Modelling non-invasive brain stimulation in cognitive neuroscience. Neurosciences and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1702–1712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.06.014 (In English)

Nikolaeva, E. I., Ilyuchina, V. A., Vergunov, E. G. (2019) Spetsifika mezhpolusharnoj funktsional’noj asimmetrii lobnoj oblasti u detej 4–7 let s zaderzhkoj psikhicheskogo i rechevogo razvitiya [Peculiarities of interhemispheric functional asymmetry of the frontal region in 4–7 year-old children with mental development and speech development delay]. Kompleksnye issledovaniya detstva — Comprehensive Child Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11–21. https://doi.org/10.33910/2687-0223-2019-1-1-11-21 (In Russian)

Ortuño, T., Grieve, K. L., Cao, R. et al. (2014) Bursting thalamic responses in awake monkey contribute to visual detection and are modulated by corticofugal feedback. Frontiers and Behavioral Neurosciences, vol. 8, article 198. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffnbeh.2014.00198 (In English)

Pasley, B. N., Allen, E. A., Freeman, R. D. (2009) State-dependent variability of neuronal responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the visual cortex. Neuron, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.03.012 (In English)

Pitcher, D., Parkin, B., Walsh, V. (2021) Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the understanding of behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 72, pp. 97–121. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-081120-013144 (In English)

Rahnev, D., Kok, P., Munneke, M. et al. (2013) Continuous theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces resting state connectivity between visual areas. Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 110, no. 8, pp. 1811–1821. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00209.2013 (in English)

Romero, M., Janssen, P., Davare, M. (2019) Neural effects of continuous theta-burst stimulation on single neurons in macaque parietal cortex. Brain Stimulation, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 485–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2018.12.587 (In English)

Ruff, C. C., Blankenburg, F., Bjoertomt, O. et al. (2006) Concurrent TMS-fMRI and psychophysics reveal frontal influences on human retinotopic visual cortex. Current Biology, vol. 16, no. 15, pp. 1479–1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.06.057 (In English)

Schwarzkopf, D. S., Silvanto, J., Rees, G. (2011) Stochastic resonance effects reveal the neural mechanisms of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Neurosciences, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 3143–3147. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4863-10.2011 (In English)

Silvanto, J., Lavie, N., Walsh, V. (2006) Stimulation of the human frontal eye fields modulates sensitivity of extrastriate visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 941–945. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00015.2006 (In English)

Silvanto, J., Muggleton, N., Walsh, V. (2008) State-dependency in brain stimulation studies of perception and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Neurosciences, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.004 (In English)

Van de Ven, V., Sack, A. T. (2013) Transcranial magnetic stimulation of visual cortex in memory: Cortical state, interference and reactivation of visual content in memory. Behavioural and Brain Research, vol. 236, no. 1, pp. 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2012.08.001 (In English)

Van Lamsweerde, A. E., Johnson, J. S. (2017) Assessing the effect of early visual cortex transcranial magnetic stimulation on working memory consolidation. Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1226–1238. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01113 (In English)

Wasserman, E. M., Epstein, C. M., Ziemann, U. et al. (eds.). (2008) The Oxford handbook of transcranial stimulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 764 p. (In English)

Published

2023-11-30

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)