Participatory design of an art space in schools

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33910/2687-0223-2025-7-2-109-116

Keywords:

art center, supplementary education, participatory design, educational environment, arts education

Abstract

This article examines the challenge of insufficient student engagement in shaping the educational environment through participatory design methodologies. Using the establishment of an art centre at School No. 2070 as a case study, it delineates the stages of the collaborative process involving children, educators, and parents, while analysing key outcomes including enhanced student motivation, spatial personalization, and development of social competencies. The study investigates the application of participatory design in organizing supplementary art education, as demonstrated through the ‘How to Become a Designer’ club and the ‘Stickers on the Walls’ project. This approach enables students to recognize the value of their contribution, personalize educational spaces, and cultivate their creative potential. The development of innovative workshops and creative hubs for extracurricular activities within schools addresses infrastructure limitations in contemporary supplementary education for youth. These dedicated spaces facilitate handson, practical learning components within the supplementary education framework. In such art studios, students transition from passive observation to active engagement, both individually and collaboratively. Establishing these creative spaces enables students to explore professional pathways within the supplementary education domain. The study emphasizes the crucial involvement of students, educators, parents, and community members throughout both the participatory design process and its implementation. Notably, involving children in school transformation initiatives has fostered their sense of belonging, strengthened self-confidence, and enhanced their recognition of personal agency within school ecosystems. The article further establishes the theoretical foundations of participatory design, educational environments, and aesthetic education that underpin these practical outcomes.

References

Источники

Конвенция о правах ребенка. (1989) Консультант Плюс. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_9959/ (дата обращения 10.04.2025).

Литература

Веракса, Н. Е. (2018) Детское развитие: две парадигмы. Культурно-историческая психология, т. 14, № 2, с. 102–108. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2018140211

Виноградова, И. А., Иванова, Е. В., Нестерова, О. В. (2017) Система оценки эффектов редизайна пространств образовательных организаций. Современные проблемы науки и образования, № 4. https://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=26650 (дата обращения 10.04.2025).

Виноградова, И. А., Иванова, Е. В., Нестерова, О. В. (2018) Исследование предметно-пространственной среды школы методом семантического дифференциала. Образование и наука, т. 20, № 6, с. 118–138. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2018-6-118-138

Выготский, Л. С. (2005) Психология развития человека. М.: Эксмо; Смысл, 1136 с.

Гарднер, Г. (2007) Структура разума: теория множественного интеллекта. М.: Вильямс, 501 с.

Иванова, Е. В., Барсукова, Е. М. (2020) Соучаствующее проектирование образовательной инфраструктуры совместно с детьми: методы и алгоритмы социального дизайна. В кн.: М. Г. Пугачева (ред.). Тенденции развития образования. Как спланировать и реализовать эффективные образовательные реформы: материалы XVII ежегодной Международной научно-практической конференции. М.: Дело, с. 125–131.

Ле-ван, Т. Н., Якшина, А. Н., Филатова, Б. А. и др. (2020) Модель соучаствующего проектирования школьных дворов: соавторство детей, педагогов и родителей. Вестник Московского городского педагогического университета. Серия: Педагогика и психология, № 2 (52), с. 55–69.

Hart, R. A. (2008) Stepping back from ‘The ladder’: Reflections on a model of participatory work with children. In: A. Reid, B. B. Jensen, J. Nikel, V. Simovska (eds.). Participation and learning. Perspectives on education and the environment, health and sustainability. Dordrecht: Springer Publ., pp. 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6416-6_2

Sources

Konventsiya o pravakh rebenka [Convention on the rights of the child]. (1989) Konsul’tant Plyus [Consultant Plus]. [Online]. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_9959/ (accessed 10.04.2025). (In Russian)

References

Gardner, H. (2007) Struktura razuma: teoriya mnozhestvennogo intellekta [Frames of mind. The theory of multiple intelligences]. Moscow: Williams Publ., 501 p. (In Russian)

Hart, R. A. (2008) Stepping back from ‘The ladder’: Reflections on a model of participatory work with children. In: A. Reid, B. B. Jensen, J. Nikel, V. Simovska (eds.). Participation and learning. Perspectives on education and the environment, health and sustainability. Dordrecht: Springer Publ., pp. 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6416-6_2 (In English)

Ivanova, E. V., Barsukova, E. M. (2020) Souchastvuyushhee proektirovanie obrazovatel’noj infrastruktury sovmestno s det’mi: metody i algoritmy sotsial’nogo dizajna [Participatory design of educational infrastructure together with children: Methods and algorithms of social design]. In: M. G. Pugacheva (ed.). Tendentsii razvitiya obrazovaniya. Kak splanirovat’ i realizovat’ effektivnye obrazovatel’nye reformy: materialy XVII ezhegodnoj Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferentsii [Trends in the development of education. How to plan and implement effective educational reforms: Proceedings of the XVII annual International scientific and practical conference]. Moscow: Delo Publ., pp. 125–131. (In Russian)

Le-van, T. N., Iakshina, A. N., Filatova, B. A. et al. (2020) Model’ souchastvuyushchego proektirovaniya shkol’nykh dvorov: soavtorstvo detej, pedagogov i roditelej [Model of participatory design of schoolyards: Collaboration of children, teachers and parents as co-authors]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika i psikhologiya — MCU Journal of Pedagogy and Psychology, no. 2 (52), pp. 55–69. (In Russian)

Veraksa, N. Ye. (2018) Detskoe razvitie: dve paradigmy [Child development: Two paradigms]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya — Cultural-Historical Psychology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 102–108. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2018140211 (In Russian)

Vinogradova, I. A., Ivanova, E. V., Nesterova, O. V. (2017) Sistema otsenki effektov redizajna prostranstv obrazovatel’nykh organizatsij [System of evaluation of educational effects of educational establishments of spaces of educational organizations]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, no. 4. [Online]. Available at: https://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=26650 (accessed 10.04.2025). (In Russian)

Vinogradova, I. A., Ivanova, E. V., Nesterova, O. V. (2018) Issledovanie predmetno-prostranstvennoj sredy shkoly metodom semanticheskogo differentsiala [Investigation of the subject-spatial environment of the school by the method of semantic differential]. Obrazovanie i nauka — The Education and Science Journal, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 118–138. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2018-6-118-138 (In Russian)

Vygotsky, L. S. (2005) Psikhologiya razvitiya cheloveka [The psychology of human development]. Moscow: Eksmo Publ.; Smysl Publ., 1136 p. (In Russian)

Published

2025-09-24

Issue

Section

Articles