Interhemispheric connectivity upon presentation of a bilingual stimulus: A longitudinal neurolinguistic EEG study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33910/2687-0223-2023-5-1-26-36

Keywords:

neurolinguistic experiment, EEG, connectivity, bilingualism, German language, Russian language, foreign language learning

Abstract

The methods of foreign language teaching available on the market of educational services require transparent and standardized evaluation in terms of the presence of the effect claimed by their creators. Such evaluation would facilitate the таchoice of an appropriate method for both individuals and government institutions. In this study, we propose metrics that, within the framework of a more general methodology, will make it possible to reliably establish whether a particular method of foreign language teaching has an effect on the linguistic performance of students. The proposed metrics are based on measuring the connectivity between individual areas of the cerebral cortex of students when recording an electroencephalogram (EEG) during the performance of language tasks. The language tasks involve categorization of proposed translations for German sentences depending on their correctness or incorrectness and the degree of the respondent’s confidence. Based on the indicators of connectivity, one can indirectly assess the number of areas of the cerebral cortex involved in the solution of a cognitive task, as well as assess the individual and group features of the interaction between these areas which may be related to the cognitive strategies that students use to solve a linguistic problem. We analysed EEG recordings obtained during two experimental sessions (with a month-long interval between them) in two groups of subjects: the first group was taught German according to the standard method, and the second group, according to the deep semantics method of P. Y. Galperin. The epochs for the analysis contained brain responses to two novel stimuli presented at the same time: a sentence in German (to translate) and in Russian (a translation version). In this paper, we describe the testing of a method which is based on the selected metrics and aimed at accentuating the difference, at the neurophysiological level, between groups of students using different teaching approaches.

References

Baccino, T., Manunta, Y. (2005) Eye-fixation-related potentials: Insight into parafoveal processing. Journal of Psychophysiology, vol. 19, no. 3, article 204. http://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803.19.3.204 (In English)

Bastos, A. M., Schoffelen, J.-M. (2016) A tutorial review of functional connectivity analysis methods and their interpretational pitfalls. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, vol. 9, article 175. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00175 (In English)

Brysbaert, M. (2019) How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. Journal of Cognition, vol. 2, no. 1, article 16. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.72 (In English)

Bullock, M., Jackson, G. D., Abbott, D. F. (2021) Artifact reduction in simultaneous EEG-fMRI: A systematic review of methods and contemporary usage. Frontiers in Neurology, vol. 12, article 622719. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.622719 (In English)

Hyvärinen, A., Oja, E. (2000) Independent component analysis: Algorithms and applications. Neural Networks, vol. 13, no. 4–5, pp. 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-6080(00)00026-5 (In English)

Jackson, A. F., Bolger, D. J. (2014) The neurophysiological bases of EEG and EEG measurement: A review for the rest of us. Psychophysiology, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12283 (In English)

Jean-Philippe, L., Eugenio, R., Jacques, M., Francisco, J. V. (1999) Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Human Brain Mapping, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 194–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1999)8:4%3C194::aid-hbm4%3E3.0.co;2-c (In English)

Kabanova, O. Ya. (2012) Teoriya P. Ya. Gal’perina — perestrojke soderzhaniya uchebnykh predmetov [Gal’perin’s theory—for reorganizing of educational disciplines]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya — Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, no. 4, pp. 113–122 (In Russian)

Khajbulina, D. R., Kopitsa, V. N., Bulganina, S. V. et al. (2022) Issledovanie konkurentsii onlajn-shkol anglijskogo yazyka i izuchenie sprosa na obrazovatel’nye uslugi [A study of the competition of online English schools and a study of the demand for educational services]. Moskovskij ekonomicheskij zhurnal — Moscow Economic Journal, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 622–635. https://doi.org/10.55186/2413046X_2022_7_5_304 (In Russian)

Klug, M., Gramann, K. (2021) Identifying key factors for improving ICA-based decomposition of EEG data in mobile and stationary experiments. European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 8406–8420. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14992 (In English)

Oostenveld, R., Praamstra, P. (2001) The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements. Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 713–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00527-7 (In English)

Pion-Tonachini, L., Kreutz-Delgado, K., Makeig, S. (2019) ICLabel: An automated electroencephalographic independent component classifier, dataset, and website. NeuroImage, vol. 198, pp. 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.026 (In English)

Richards, J. C., Rodgers, T. S. (2001) Approaches and methods in language teaching. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 270 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305 (In English)

Shtern, E. N., Savost’yanov, A. N., Lebedkin, D. A. (2022) Deyatel’nostnaya teoriya i teoriya yazykovogo soznaniya P. Ya. Gal’perina: rezul’taty EEG issledovaniya v perspektive obucheniya inostrannym yazykam s pomoshch’yu IKT [P. Ya. Galperin’s activity theory and language consciousness theory: Results of EEG-based research with regard to ICT-assisted foreign language]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya — NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 81–92. https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2022-20-2-81-92 (In Russian)

Sidneva, A. N. (2019) Osnovnye napravleniya kritiki teorii planomerno-poetapnogo formirovaniya umstvennykh dejstvij i ponyatij [Basic objections to the theory of stage-by-stage formation of mental actions and concepts]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya — Cultural-Historical Psychology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 22–31. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2019150303 (In Russian)

Stam, C. J., Nolte, G., Daffertshofer, A. (2007) Phase lag index: Assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources. Human Brain Mapping, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1178–1193. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20346 (In English)

Talyzina, N. F. (1993) Teoriya planomernogo formirovaniya umstvennykh dejstvij segodnya [Systematic-phased mental actions and concepts development theory as of today]. Voprosy psikhologii, no. 1, pp. 92–101. (In Russian)

Tan, Y. S. M., Amiel, J. J. (2022) Teachers learning to apply neuroscience to classroom instruction: Case of professional development in British Columbia. Professional Development in Education, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1689522 (In English)

Van de Steen, F., Faes, L., Karahan, E. et al. (2019) Critical comments on EEG sensor space dynamical connectivity analysis. Brain Topography, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 643–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-016-0538-7 (In English)

Xie, W., Toll, R. T., Nelson, C. A. (2022) EEG functional connectivity analysis in the source space. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 56, article 101119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101119 (In English)

Published

2023-04-03

Issue

Section

Articles