Intersex-children in a binary culture: The disadvantaged gender

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33910/2687-0223-2021-3-4-353-359

Keywords:

intersex, embodiment, sexual identity, bullying, medicalisation, gender socialisation strategies

Abstract

The article examines the role of embodiment, namely the characteristics of sexual development, in identity development in childhood. It raises a question of the social and psychological consequences for children with intersex variations (with and without medical intervention), whose knowledge of their bodies can be severely limited. It is concluded that the conceptual inaccuracies in the existing definitions of sex and gender affect the weak language tools for polymorphic sexual identification. In the process of social development, the child’s body is both an object of understanding and an agent acting in interaction. Accordingly, the physiological characteristics of the body are taken into account by the child when constructing an identity, ensuring his self-presentation and driving the choice of communication strategies. Intersex children frequently have distorted or insufficient information about their own bodies, because their parents consider this information an obstacle to successful social adaptation in a hierarchical gender environment. The main factor in the actualisation of intersex topic was feminist research. These studies have challenged the binary definition of gender, discovering significant inconsistencies in the dominant biological interpretation. The article comes to the following conclusions. First, the dichotomous matrix of ideas about sexuality prevents a neutral attitude to the sexual anatomy of individuals, which underlies all existing social relations. Male anatomical features are given a symbolic meaning of power, and female that of subordination. Second, conceptual inaccuracies in the existing definitions of sex and gender affect the weak language tools for polymorphic sexual identification. Third, in the post-Soviet discourse at the state (legal, medical, political, etc.) and interpersonal (family, peer) levels, intersex children are a socially excluded and unrecognised group, deprived of legal protection.

References

ИСТОЧНИКИ

Ассоциация русскоязычных интерсекс людей. (2020) [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://arsintersex.org/ (дата обращения 14.02.2021).

Интерсекс.ру. (2021) [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.interseks.ru/ (дата обращения 13.02.2021).

SOURCES

Assotsiatsiya russkoyazychnykh interseks lyudej [Association of Russian Speaking Intersex]. (2020) [Online]. URL: https://arsintersex.org/ (accessed 14.02.2021). (In Russian)

Interseks.ru [Intersex.ru]. (2021) [Online]. URL: https://www.interseks.ru/ (accessed 13.02.2021). (In Russian)

REFERENCES

Adorno, T. (1978) Minima moralia: Reflections from damaged life. New York: Verso Press, 251 p. (In English)

Bochaver, A. A., Khlomov, K. D. (2013) Bulling kak ob’ekt issledovanij i kul’turnyj fenomen [Bulling as a research object and a cultural phenomenon]. Psihologiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki — Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 149–159. (In Russian)

Callens, N., Kreukels, B., van de Grift, T. (2021) Young voices: Sexual health and transition care needs in adolescents with intersex/differences of sex development — a pilot study. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2020.11.001 (In English)

Corsaro, W. A. (2005) The sociology of childhood. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press, 359 p. (In English)

Corsaro, W. A., Fingerson, L. (2003) Development and socialization in childhood. In: J. DeLamater (ed.). Handbook of social psychology: Handbooks of sociology and social research. New York: Kluwer-Plenum Publ., pp. 125–155. (In English)

Dalke, K. B., Baratz, A. B., Greenberg, J. A. (2020) Protecting children with intersex traits: Legal, ethical, and human rights considerations. In: M. Legato (ed.). The plasticity of sex: The molecular biology and clinical features of genomic sex, gender identity and sexual behavior. London: Academic Press., pp. 207–224. (In English)

Dreger, A. D. (1998) Hermaphrodites and the medical invention of sex. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 268 p. (In English)

Farmer, T. W., Xie, H. (2007) Aggression and school social dynamics: The good, the bad, and the ordinary. Journal of School Psychology, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 461–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.06.008 (In English)

Fausto-Sterling, А. (2000) Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York: Basic Books Publ., 488 p. (In English)

Feola, M. (2014) Difference without fear: Adorno contra liberalism. European Journal of Political Theory, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885112474442 (In English)

Fingerson, L. (2009) Children’s bodies. In: J. Qvortrup, W. A. Corsaro, M. Honig (eds.). The Palgrave handbook of childhood. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan Publ., pp. 217–227. (In English)

Giddens, A. (2004) Transformatsia intimnosti [The transformation of intimacy]. Saint Petersburg: Piter Publ., 208 p. (In Russian)

Hausman, B. L. (1992) Demanding subjectivity: transsexualism, medicine, and the technologies of gender. Journal of the History of Sexuality, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 270–302. PMID: 11612877 (In English)

Lampalzer, U., Briken, P., Schweizer, K. (2020) Dealing with uncertainty and lack of knowledge in diverse sex development: Controversies on early surgery and questions of consent. Sexual Medicine, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 472–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2020.03.002 (In English)

Martin, K. A. (1996) Puberty, sexuality, and the self: Girls and boys at adolescence. New York: Routledge Publ., 176 p. (In English)

Rosenberg, M. (2019) Nenasil’stvennoe obscheniye: Yazik zhizni [Nonviolent communication: A language of life]. Moscow: Sofiya Publ., 288 p. (In Russian)

Savel’ev, I. S. (2017) Kosmeticheskaya genital’naya khirurgiya interseks-mladentsev: meditsinskoe pravo protiv prav cheloveka [Cosmetic genital surgery of intersex infants: Medical law versus human rights]. Molodoj uchenyj, no. 17 (151), pp. 25–29. (In Russian)

Smith, S. (2002) Children at play. In: J. Mills, R. Mills (eds.). Childhood studies. A reader in perspectives of childhood. New York: Routledge Publ., pp. 79–96. (In English)

Thorne, B. (1993) Gender play: Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 237 p. (In English)

Tolman, D. L. (2002) Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 272 p. (In English)

Turner, S. S. (1999) Intersex identities: Locating new intersections of sex and gender. Gender and Society, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 457–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124399013004003 (In English)

Published

2022-02-07

Issue

Section

Academic news and updates